but we kinda all gave up on it before that.
Statistics: Posted by Sighence — February 8th, 2010, 12:18 am
]]>
~Paidea
Statistics: Posted by Paidea — February 7th, 2010, 2:00 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
Ah well - too many obstacles to getting it played on RV.
Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — January 14th, 2010, 10:16 pm
]]>
I was considering doing this, may as well join in while it's the cool thing to do.
Statistics: Posted by Topsummoner — January 14th, 2010, 8:38 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
If we need to enact a second leave of absense, something seems wrong (I would have voted No to this proposal anyway.)
I'll still be watching and cheering you guys on; I just won't be able to win by paradox anymore.
Statistics: Posted by Saten Ruiko — January 12th, 2010, 11:16 pm
]]>
Depends how long the game will last I suppose. We've lost most players through silly strike provisions that will change (hopefully) when it becomes simple majority and the time can be extended. Beyond that I don't see any near end in sight - although I confess some trepidation as to how the 10 points for voting against a proposal will work out. I might even support removing it the more I consider it.
Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — January 12th, 2010, 10:54 pm
]]>
Also, we are even going to get to the point where people are going to need a second leave of absence? We've only even had one taken.
Statistics: Posted by Sighence — January 12th, 2010, 2:18 pm
]]>
Change to rule 303 (which presumably passed despite the question mark on the first page?)
Current Rule 303 wrote:
Rule 303: Any player not proposing a rule-change during their allotted time period (as stated in rule 202) gains a strike. Any player not submitting a vote (or abstention from voting) to the judge within the alloted time period (as stated in rule 212) gains a strike.
Any player who has gained three strikes immediately loses the game and takes no further turns nor participates in any votes, discussions, or judgments. Players who have lost the game can no longer post in the topic.
Once per game, a player may take a leave of absence. Taking a leave of absence excuses a player for 1 complete circuit starting from the turn they took the leave. Players on leave cannot gain strikes. A player on leave may rejoin the game during any turn prior to their leave ending, but upon rejoining, their leave of absence ends, even if 1 complete circuit has not been made.
Proposed Rule 303 wrote:
Rule 303: Any player not proposing a rule-change during their allotted time period (as stated in rule 202) gains a strike. Any player not submitting a vote (or abstention from voting) to the judge within the alloted time period (as stated in rule 212) gains a strike.
Any player who has gained three strikes immediately loses the game and takes no further turns nor participates in any votes, discussions, or judgments. Players who have lost the game can no longer post in the topic.
Once per game, a player may take a leave of absence. Taking a leave of absence excuses a player for 1 complete circuit starting from the turn they took the leave. Players on leave cannot gain strikes. A player on leave may rejoin the game during any turn prior to their leave ending, but upon rejoining, their leave of absence ends, even if 1 complete circuit has not been made. If a player wishes to take a second leave of absence, they must request this in the game thread, with unanimous consent amongst the players required.
Also, the first page is terribly confusing. Amendments (successful or failed) haven't been added and the whole this is one god awful mess. Since rules are the chief weapons we have in this game, it's not good.
Statistics: Posted by Tweedy — January 12th, 2010, 9:30 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Sighence — January 11th, 2010, 10:45 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>